Judicial Activism Essay, Research Paper
Judicial Activism is a doctrine that describes the way a court should actively access its? power as a check to the activities of governmental bodies, when it is thought that those bodies have exceeded their authority. Roger Clegg, vice president of the National Legal Center for the Public Interest describes his definition a little differently. He writes that it is the act of a judge abusing his/her power by asserting his/her opinion of what the law should be, instead of what it really is. Clegg feels that in its? history the Supreme Court has often constructed new constitutional rights with no basis from constitutional background. Roger Clegg is a strong opponent of judicial activism. He also feels that judges in today?s courts are setting up policies, which they have no competence in doing, at the state and national level. Clegg says that policymaking needs to be left in the hands of elected officials. Judges are setting up gay-rights ordinances in Colorado and making welfare policy for illegal immigrants in California (Clegg p.246). According to Clegg these are policies that legislative branch should be dealing with, not the judicial branch. When judges take on policymaking they take it out of the hands of qualified members. They also remove it from the compromising political process. He says that an activist court is not one that makes decisions based on the Constitution, but by personal views.
According to Clegg, one of the best examples of judicial activism was the Supreme Courts? decision between Roe versus Wade. The court constructed a constitutional ?right? to abortion. This very controversial issue needed to be further discussed before the Supreme Courts ruling. Their decision took the issue out of the hands of our elected officials. The Supreme Court judges quickly decided that under the Constitution, the right to privacy was broad enough to include the mother?s decision to abort. No court should have the jurisdiction to make this personal and questionable decision. Another example of activism was during the Supreme Court case of Dred Scott versus Sanford. The Dred Scott decision made by the Supreme Court said that African Americans are not citizens and should not be given the privileges of citizenship. The courts invented the absolute right that slaveholders can do whatever they chose with their property. Looking back on these Supreme Court decisions it is seen that the judges made some difficult decisions to quickly and also allowed their own wishes to take the place of Constitutional rights.
Activism is sometimes paired with liberalism and restraint is paired with conservatism. However, there are liberal judges that can be restraint and vice versa. It is sometimes quite difficult to determine whether a judge will decide one way or the other on any issue.
Clegg writes that judges at any level must face great internal and external pressures to be activist from the media and political opinion. In many social atmospheres judges get greater acknowledgement if he/she is known for speeding up the political process. Also interest groups love to work with only one or two judges to pass a particular policy than working with an entire electorate. However, being an activist means that you are also susceptible to personal, social, and political pressures to refrain from continuing activism. With great pressure to choose one side or another it can be quite easy for a mediocre judge to make a bad judgment.
In defense of judicial activism, Clegg writes that there is basic human nature is rooted in wanting to demonstrate personal views. First he writes that individuals going into the political field have the desire to show their strong views of the way the government ought to be organized. Secondly he writes that individuals that go into government often have the desire to initiate change in their surroundings. This could possibly be done through joining an interest group or the individual might wish to force change through his or her own views while in a position of power. Additionally, judges should not be criticized for misinterpretation of badly written laws. Politicians sometimes do write poorly detailed bills. They do this for the very fact that the more vague a bill is written the more often it is found to receive greater votes in the bill passing process. If a bill is written vaguely there will be many different interpretations. In the defense of the court making a personal decision for childbirth in the case of Roe versus Wade the Supreme Court put many restrictions on the abortion process for mothers.
Clegg also writes that many people are confused over the real meaning to the idea of judicial activism. Some individuals think of activism as being on the ball or energetic. Likewise, being restraint would mean lazy and letting the caseload pile up. This is the way many individuals who do not understand see activism superficially. A more complicated view, however, still incorrect is when any decision that produces judicial power against the governmental branches is considered activism. Whether it is to overturn old precedents or to strike down a statute that is blatantly unconstitutional many individuals do not fully understand that this is not acting in an activist manner. If a court overturns a precedent that it feels to be unconstitutional then it is not being an activist court, because it is doing what it was designed to do.
The Judiciary system was designed to be the least dangerous branch (Clegg p.247). However, as pressure increases for greater response to issues in the world, this branch has received greater attention. In today?s society being restraint and not allowing personal views to interfere with your jobs? responsibility requires a great deal more energy. Judicial activism is still used as a check on the other branches. In my opinion activism has at times been abused, but there is good reason for its? existence. One way to help solve any unnecessary judicial control could be to write laws that can be easier to interpret and facilitate. Realistically, the only way to keep judicial activism out of the system is to make political executives and legislators lose political popularity by appointing activism judges.
In today?s Supreme Court the Chief Justice is William Rehnquist. He has made a rightward swing from the two previous Chief Justices, William E. Burger and Earl Warren. Rehnquist believes in trying to deal with cases first on the local level then proceeding form there. He wants to lesson the influence that the federal courts have on decisions (Garrow p.257). He has made much of his success in cases that dealt with distribution of power between states and the federal government. It does not seem that the Rehnquist court is activist due to his conservative views; however, it was his court that made the Roe versus Wade decision. At times the vote of the Chief Justice is not in the majority of the votes, then the decision falls in the hands of the swing voters. Often during these times it becomes the vote of Anthony Kennedy. The Supreme Court is then called the ?Kennedy Court.? For the reason that not one judge in the court can make an overwhelming difference in the final outcome, I feel that there cannot be a fully activist or restraint court.
Другие работы по теме:
Judicial Precedent Essay Research Paper ESSAY a
Judicial Precedent Essay, Research Paper ESSAY: a) Explain and illustrate the operation of the doctrine of judicial precedent. b) How far is it true to say judges are bound by decisions in earlier cases?
A Successful Administration Essay Research Paper A
A Successful Administration Essay, Research Paper A Successful Administration Each president elected desires a smoothly operating administration run by competent officials in order to accomplish his goals and prerogatives and shared political ideologies between head administration members are vital to a successful government.
Law Essay Research Paper 1 The trial
Law Essay, Research Paper 1. The trial court is bound by the Supreme Court s decision under Stare Decisis. The Supreme Court is the highest court in the judicial system. All other courts are most likely to follow a higher courts decision. The only time a precedent would change is if it is out of date, the situation is different, or if the ruling is found invalid.
Interpreting The Text Of The Constitution Essay
, Research Paper The United States Constitution defines the laws of the land as the Constitution itself and those laws or legal documents that are constitutionally passed through legislature. The role of upholding these laws and interpreting them in cases are assigned to the judicial branch. Our judicial system is to be one that follows common law, so ultimately laws do come from courts.
Cdn Provinces
&Federalsystem Essay, Research Paper The Provinces and the Federal System The three areas of federal and provincial relations where decentralization is made evident are as follows:
Marbury Vs Madison Essay Research Paper Marbury
Marbury Vs. Madison Essay, Research Paper Marbury V. Madison As the government was newly establishing its stronghold on the nation, forging its way to a powerful republic and instituting precedents for the future, a struggle to preserve the foundations of American Society instituted by Washington and John Adams existed as Thomas Jefferson took office.
Marbury V Madison Trial Essay Research Paper
Marbury v. Madison The issue before the Supreme Court was the question of the court?s own constitutional authority, and to decide whether or not to issue the writ and if this would
Amistad Movie Review Essay Research Paper The
Amistad Movie Review Essay, Research Paper The movie Amistad is a 4 star film because I believe it is historically accurate, very effective in showing the way slaves were treated, and the way slavery and the American judicial system worked during the Antebellum period. The movie was also a good watch, and was entertaining and educational at the same time.
The Contemporary Debate Over Constitutional Interpretation Essay
, Research Paper The debate over the role of the judiciary in the government has been going on for a long time. Some say that the Supreme Court has overstepped the boundaries that it is to operate by, while others believe that much of the Constitution was written in such a way that it needs to be interpreted according to the situations that have arisen in today’s society.
Americas Political Legacy Essay Research Paper Websters
Americas Political Legacy Essay, Research Paper Webster?s Dictionary defines legacy as ?anything handed down from an ancestor, predecessor, or earlier era.? Legacy is something that has been passed on, something that teaches, something that is embraces a person or society and aids them through life with knowledge and a proven system.
Social Democracy Essay Research Paper Austria is
Social Democracy Essay, Research Paper Austria is a democratic, federal republic. The constitution of Austria provides for a distinct division of power among the executive, legislative and judicial branches of government. Basic human rights and liberties are granted by the constitution and so are the rights of minorities granted as well.
Judicial Review And J Marshal Essay Research
Paper As the fourth Supreme Court Chief Justice of the United States of America, John Marshall created a legacy that has endured nearly two hundred years. While writing the majority opinion for the Supreme Court case of Marbury v. Madison in 1803, he single-handedly changed the course of our judicial system.
Judicial Review Essay Research Paper Towering over
Judicial Review Essay, Research Paper Towering over us all When looking at the three branches of government one sees all the power that the people have given them. One is looking at all the great accomplishments in the history of the U.S.A. In the beginning, the United States government was formed in the intent of having the power fall in the order of executive, legislative, and then judicial.
Judicial Review Essay Research Paper Judicial ReviewThe
Judicial Review Essay, Research Paper Judicial Review The Supreme Court is the only court designated in the constitution. Within it is the Chief Justice of the United States, and eight associates. Being the highest court it is the last resort for all federal court questions. The Supreme Court has the power to determine whether something is constitutional or not, which makes them the final authority.
Ceremony Essay Research Paper Title Television Cameras
Ceremony Essay, Research Paper Title: Television Cameras in the Courtroom Televised court cases stand accused of ruining defendant’s lives and making a mockery of The judicial process. Many defendants including O.J have made this accusation. Simpson, accused of murdering his ex-wife and her male friend, and Former British Nanny Louise Woodward.
John Marshall Essay Research Paper John MarshallIn
John Marshall Essay, Research Paper John Marshall In early American history, the powers of the executive and legislative branches of the government were already well defined. However, the judicial branch needed to establish its position as an equal of the other two branches. John Marshall was crucial in making this happen.
US Government Essay Research Paper The framers
US Government Essay, Research Paper The framers of the Constitution had a vision for a new nation, and a new government to regulate it. They saw the conditions in which England existed
French Government Essay Research Paper The modern
French Government Essay, Research Paper The modern French government is run very much like the government of the United States. France is a democratic republic that is divided into three branches,
Constitutionalism Essay Research Paper The seventeenth century
Constitutionalism Essay, Research Paper The seventeenth century, which witnessed the development of absolute monarchy, also saw the appearance of the constitutional state. While France solved the question of sovereignty with the absolutist state, England evolved toward the constitutional state.
Presidential Power Essay Research Paper Powers of
Presidential Power Essay, Research Paper Powers of the Presidency The President of the United States is probably the most powerful and influential person in the whole world. Alone, he has full control over the Executive Branch and has a lot of roles that he is the leader of. With this in mind, I think that the power given to the President is still balance along with the Legislative and Judicial Branch.
Seperation Of Powers Essay Research Paper Separation
Seperation Of Powers Essay, Research Paper Separation of Powers Separation of powers is the act of separating of responsibilities of the three branches of the government. The idea of this separation is not a new one either. John Locke originally talked about it. He stated that the legislative power should be divided between the King and Parliament in England.
3 Branches Of Government Essay Research Paper
There are three branches of the federal government, the executive, the judicial, and the legislative. The executive branch consists of such people as the president, the cabinet, and the executive offices of the president. The executive branch is known for enforcing laws created by the legislative branch.
Death Penalty Essay Research Paper Chad HeldtSociologyPeriod
Death Penalty Essay, Research Paper Chad Heldt Sociology Period 1 4/28/98 The Death Penalty Should It Be Allowed Or Not? In my paper I plan to give my opinion and my position on the death penalty. I believe the death penalty should be for hardened criminals like the Charlie Mansons of the world and people like that.
Framers Ideals And Legislation Essay Research Paper
Framers Ideals and Legislation Branches on the Tree of Liberty Why, if one were concerned with protecting human liberty, would one want to make the legislative branch of government dominant rather than the executive or judicial? Are these good reasons for someone concerned with liberty to distrust a strong executive or a powerful judicial?
The Judicial System Essay Research Paper This
The Judicial System Essay, Research Paper This is very long, I just didn’t wrap the words The Judicial System The justice system in our country today, is one of the best in the world, but it is not without problems. The 12-person Jury system has good intent but has definite faults and should be rethought and possibly revamped.
JUDICIAL REVIEW Essay Research Paper uncategorized
JUDICIAL REVIEW Essay, Research Paper : uncategorized : Pros and Cons of Judicial Review Pros and Cons of Judicial Review Judicial Review is the power given to Supreme court justices in which a judge has the power to reason whether a law is unconstitutional or not. Chief Justice John Ma
Judicial Activism Vs Judicial Restraint Essay Research
Paper Judicial activism and judicial restraint are two opposing philosophies when it comes to the Supreme Court justices’ interpretations of the United States Constitution; justices appointed by the President to the Supreme Court serve for life,and thus whose decisions shape the lives of “We the people” for a long time to come.
Judicial Precedent Essay Plan Essay Research Paper
Judicial Precedent Essay planIntro Say what precedent is: ?Stare decesis et non quieta movere? = Stand by what has been decided and do not unsettle the established. Which means a decision made in one case is binding on all
Cohen Vs Virginia Essay Research Paper is
Cohen Vs Virginia Essay, Research Paper is Cohens vs. Virginia, in which the question arose as to the right of the Supreme Court to exercise its appellate jurisdiction over the judgment of a state court involving the validity of state legislation. The contention of the counsel for the state struck at the very root of the judicial system of the Union, with its authority to review state decisions which involved the binding effect of the Federal Constitution and laws: and so to the discussion of this fundamental question Marshall brought his heaviest artillery.
California Law Essay Research Paper Caleb FairleyJudicial
California Law Essay, Research Paper Caleb Fairley Judicial Proc. 9/03/00 1. California law restricts the use of guns by seeing to it that the guns are safer, and by being safer they are registered by the Department of Justice. The Department of Justice tests the guns to make sure that they meet all safety needs and that the guns are not faulty.
A Tale Of Two Cities Faults Of
Social Structure Essay, Research Paper A Tale of Two Cities: Faults of Social Structure Charles Dickens has been acclaimed as one of the foremost satirists of the
Law And Society Essay Research Paper Law
Law And Society Essay, Research Paper Law and Society The function of law in a society is more or less universal. It acts as a deterrent to control the evil and treacherous behavior of humans, to maintain discipline and imposes restrictions on some freedom. We live in a chaotic and uncertain world. Without an orderly environment based on and backed by law, the normal activities of life would be lacerated with chaos.